United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 16-1301
                     ___________________________

                              Calvin Hammock

                    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                        v.

 NASA Headquarters; Department of Defense; Space Exploration Technologies
  Space X; Apple; Blackberry (Curve) Corporation; Virgin Mobile; Mediacom
             WiFi; American Water Iowa; Unknown Defendants

                   lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                    ____________

                  Appeal from United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
                               ____________

                         Submitted: October 3, 2016
                           Filed: October 4, 2016
                               [Unpublished]
                               ____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Calvin Hammock appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se
complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order
because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that Hammock failed
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 

,
678 (2009); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 

, 570 (2007); Kelly v. City of
Omaha, 

, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review). Accordingly, the judgment
of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                          ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Southern District of Iowa.

                                         -2-