United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 16-2413
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                              Thomas Scott Crossland

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith
                                 ____________

                           Submitted: February 2, 2017
                             Filed: February 7, 2017
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Thomas Crossland appeals the district court’s1 order denying his motion for a
sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to the


      1
      The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas.
Guidelines. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief
suggesting that a sentence reduction was warranted in light of the manner in which
Crossland’s advisory Guidelines imprisonment range for two drug offenses was
calculated. Crossland has not filed a supplemental brief.

       After careful review of the record, we conclude that Crossland was ineligible
for a sentence reduction because his sentences for the drug offenses were not based
on the Guidelines, but rather were based on the applicable statutory maximums. See
United States v. Scurlark, 

, 841 (8th Cir. 2009) (de novo review of
whether § 3582(c)(2) authorizes modification); United States v. Johnson, 

, 1191 (8th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (affirming denial of § 3582(c)(2) motion
where Guidelines range did not serve as basis for term of imprisonment).

      Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw.
                     ______________________________




                                        -2-