Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Estelean Dodge v. Hartford Life & Accident, 17-1417 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-1417 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1417 _ Estelean Jeanette Dodge lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: January 26, 2018 Filed: February 13, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Estelean Jeanette Dodge appeals after th
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 17-1417
                        ___________________________

                              Estelean Jeanette Dodge

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                            v.

                 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
                                      ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: January 26, 2018
                             Filed: February 13, 2018
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                       ____________

PER CURIAM.

     Estelean Jeanette Dodge appeals after the District Court1 dismissed her
complaint alleging that she had been wrongfully denied long-term disability benefits

      1
       The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
and asserting a claim under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. The
District Court dismissed the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, concluding in a well-reasoned order that the cause of action was
time-barred. After de novo review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper for the
reasons stated by the District Court.2 See Kelly v. City of Omaha, 
813 F.3d 1070
,
1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review).

      We affirm the judgment of the District Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




      2
       We decline to consider issues raised for the first time on appeal or documents
that were not before the District Court. See Dubinsky v. Mermart, LLC, 
595 F.3d 812
, 819 (8th Cir. 2010); Griffin v. Super Valu, 
218 F.3d 869
, 871 (8th Cir. 2000).

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer