Filed: Dec. 08, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 08 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRANK B. COCKRELL, II, No. 08-55163 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-07-06971-CAS v. MEMORANDUM * MICHAEL BRADBURY; et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 17, 2009 ** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Ju
Summary: FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 08 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRANK B. COCKRELL, II, No. 08-55163 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-07-06971-CAS v. MEMORANDUM * MICHAEL BRADBURY; et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 17, 2009 ** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Jud..
More
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 08 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANK B. COCKRELL, II, No. 08-55163
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-07-06971-CAS
v.
MEMORANDUM *
MICHAEL BRADBURY; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 17, 2009 **
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Frank B. Cockrell, II, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as barred by Heck v.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477 (1994). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Huftile
v. Miccio-Fonseca,
410 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action alleging that the defendants
engaged in a conspiracy leading to Cockrell’s criminal convictions because
judgment in Cockrell’s favor would necessarily imply the invalidity of those
convictions, and Cockrell has failed to demonstrate that his convictions have been
invalidated. See
Heck, 512 U.S. at 487.
Cockrell’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
2 08-55163