Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ortega, ACM S32587 (2019)

Court: United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals Number: ACM S32587 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32587 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tevin W. ORTEGA Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 12 December 2019 _ Military Judge: Joseph S. Imburgia. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 1 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan. For Appellant: Major Chri
More
                  U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE
                 C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
                              ________________________

                                   No. ACM S32587
                              ________________________

                                 UNITED STATES
                                     Appellee
                                           v.
                              Tevin W. ORTEGA
                 Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
                              ________________________

           Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
                             Decided 12 December 2019
                              ________________________

Military Judge: Joseph S. Imburgia.
Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months,
reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 1 February 2019
by SpCM convened at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan.
For Appellant: Major Christopher C. Newton, USAF.
For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.
Before MINK, LEWIS, and D. JOHNSON, Appellate Military Judges.
                              ________________________

       This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as
       precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
                          ________________________


PER CURIAM:
    The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-
ror materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles
59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). *



*   Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.).


                                            1
             United States v. Ortega, No. ACM S32587


Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.


            FOR THE COURT



            CAROL K. JOYCE
            Clerk of the Court

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer