Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32587 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tevin W. ORTEGA Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 12 December 2019 _ Military Judge: Joseph S. Imburgia. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 1 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan. For Appellant: Major Chri
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32587 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tevin W. ORTEGA Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 12 December 2019 _ Military Judge: Joseph S. Imburgia. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 1 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan. For Appellant: Major Chris..
More
U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE
C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
________________________
No. ACM S32587
________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Tevin W. ORTEGA
Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
________________________
Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
Decided 12 December 2019
________________________
Military Judge: Joseph S. Imburgia.
Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months,
reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 1 February 2019
by SpCM convened at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan.
For Appellant: Major Christopher C. Newton, USAF.
For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.
Before MINK, LEWIS, and D. JOHNSON, Appellate Military Judges.
________________________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as
precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
________________________
PER CURIAM:
The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-
ror materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles
59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). *
* Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.).
1
United States v. Ortega, No. ACM S32587
Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT
CAROL K. JOYCE
Clerk of the Court