Filed: Oct. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM 39624 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Bianca R. ACEVEDOPELLICCIA Technical Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 17 October 2019 _ Military Judge: Bryon T. Gleisner. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 8 months, and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 30 October 2018 by GCM con- vened at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. For Appellant: Major Mark J
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM 39624 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Bianca R. ACEVEDOPELLICCIA Technical Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 17 October 2019 _ Military Judge: Bryon T. Gleisner. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 8 months, and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 30 October 2018 by GCM con- vened at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. For Appellant: Major Mark J...
More
U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE
C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
________________________
No. ACM 39624
________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Bianca R. ACEVEDOPELLICCIA
Technical Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
________________________
Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
Decided 17 October 2019
________________________
Military Judge: Bryon T. Gleisner.
Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 8 months,
and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 30 October 2018 by GCM con-
vened at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida.
For Appellant: Major Mark J. Schwartz, USAF.
For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Lieutenant
Colonel Brian C. Mason, USAF; Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.
Before MINK, LEWIS, and D. JOHNSON, Appellate Military Judges.
________________________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as
precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
________________________
PER CURIAM:
The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-
ror materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles
59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). *
* Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.).
Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT
CAROL K. JOYCE
Clerk of the Court