Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM 39667 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. John W. ESTABROOK Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 20 December 2019 _ Military Judge: Christopher M. Schumann. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months, and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 30 January 2019 by GCM con- vened at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. For Appellant: Major Rodrigo
Summary: U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM 39667 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. John W. ESTABROOK Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 20 December 2019 _ Military Judge: Christopher M. Schumann. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months, and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 30 January 2019 by GCM con- vened at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. For Appellant: Major Rodrigo ..
More
U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE
C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
________________________
No. ACM 39667
________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
John W. ESTABROOK
Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
________________________
Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
Decided 20 December 2019
________________________
Military Judge: Christopher M. Schumann.
Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months,
and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 30 January 2019 by GCM con-
vened at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska.
For Appellant: Major Rodrigo M. Caruço, USAF.
For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Brian C. Mason, USAF; Mary Ellen
Payne, Esquire.
Before J. JOHNSON, POSCH, and KEY, Appellate Military Judges.
________________________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as
precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
________________________
PER CURIAM:
The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-
ror materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles
United States v. Estabrook, No. ACM 39667
59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). *
Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT
CAROL K. JOYCE
Clerk of the Court
* Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.).
2