Pitts v. Thompson, 5:19-cv-297-DPM-JTK. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20200107899
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . Objection, No. 24, overruled. Magistrate Judge Kearney did not clearly err or misapply the law in denying Pitts's request to add Thomas as a Defendant. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a). As Magistrate Judge Kearney explained, if Pitts wants to pursue claims about interference with his mail, then he must do so in a separate lawsuit after exhausting his administrative remedies. No. 13 at 2. So Ordered.
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
Objection, No. 24, overruled. Magistrate Judge Kearney did not clearly err or misapply the law in denying Pitts's request to add Thomas as a Defendant. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a). As Magistrate Judge Kearney explained, if Pitts wants to pursue claims about interference with his mail, then he must do so in a separate lawsuit after exhausting his administrative remedies. No. 13 at 2.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
