JUDGMENT KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order entered in this matter on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Robert E. Woodward's claims are dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied. It is so ordered.
ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on April 10, 2019 (Dkt. No. 24). The relevant procedural history is as follows. On January 4, 2019, plaintiff Robert E. Woodward, proceeding pro se, filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a complaint against defendants James Gibson, Warden of the Varner Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction ("ADC"), and Wendy...
JUDGMENT KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order entered in this matter on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Debra A. Martin's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied. It is so adjudged.
OPINION AND ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant George Ervin "Sonny" Perdue, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") (Dkt. No. 24). In her complaint, plaintiff Debra A. Martin alleges that the USDA subjected her to unlawful discrimination on the basis of race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq....
ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After careful review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney's partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 10] is adopted. Shaw, Love, Meriott, and Crystal McMahan are dismissed as defendants in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Although Mr. Gilliam has listed his requests more clearly in his objections, there is still no evidence of irreparable...
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION J. THOMAS RAY , Magistrate Judge . The following Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") has been sent to United States District Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. You may file written objections to all or part of this Recommendation. If you do so, those objections must: (1) specifically explain the factual and/or legal basis for your objections; and (2) be received by the Clerk of this Court within fourteen (14) days of this Recommendation. By not objecting, you may waive...
ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After careful review, United States Magistrate Beth Deere's recommended disposition [Doc. No. 32] is adopted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. Jesse Jones failed to update his address [Doc. No. 30]. IT IS SO ORDERED.
JUDGMENT BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Department of Labor and jointly against Defendants E.J.'s Cleaning Services, Inc. and Edwin Johnson in the amount of $17,487.00. It is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice.
ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . The United States Department of Labor (DOL) brought this lawsuit against Defendants, claiming that they had violated various provisions of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or Act), 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. (Doc. Nos. 1) Specifically, the DOL asserted that Defendants had violated minimum wage, record keeping, and overtime requirements of the Act. ( Id. ) As a result of its failure to obey a Court order to obtain corporate counsel, a...
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INSTRUCTIONS JOE J. VOLPE , Magistrate Judge . The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Judge James M. Moody, Jr. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original...
JUDGMENT JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . Consistent with the Order entered separately today, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief sought is denied, and the case is closed. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3).
ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After conducting a de novo review, this Court adopts the Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 47, 77) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against all remaining Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE....
JUDGMENT KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order entered in this matter on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiffs' pre-empted federal-law claims against defendants the American Federation of Government Employees, National President David Cox, National Vice President Michael Kelly, National Representatives Jesus Sanchez and Robert Harrison, the National Executive Council, and Local 953 Members Dave Gassett and Rodney Davis (collectively, "the...
ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants the American Federation of Government Employees, National President David Cox, National Vice President Michael Kelly, National Representatives Jesus Sanchez and Robert Harrison, the National Executive Council, and Local 953 Members Dave Gassett and Rodney Davis (collectively, "the Union Defendants") (Dkt. No. 3). Also before the Court is defendant Sherri Harrison's (...
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . I. Introduction: Janet Smith applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, alleging disability beginning April 5, 2012. (Tr. at 13, 167-77) Ms. Smith's claims were denied initially and upon reconsideration. (Tr. 99-105, 108-111) After conducting a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied her applications. (Tr. at 13-22, 27-50) Ms. Smith requested that the Appeals Council review the ALJ'...
ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in...
JUDGMENT KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order entered this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Garrett Chamblis's complaint is dismissed. The relief requested is denied. So adjudged.
ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 102). Plaintiff Garrett Chamblis has not filed objections, and the time to file objections has passed. After careful consideration of the Recommended Disposition, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects ( Id. ). Consistent with...
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION J. THOMAS RAY , Magistrate Judge . The following Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") has been sent to United States District Judge Kristine G. Baker. Any party may file written objections to this Recommendation. Objections must be specific and include the factual or legal basis for disagreeing with the Recommendation. An objection to a factual finding must specifically identify the finding of fact believed to be wrong and describe the evidence that supports...
