Gilliam v. Staley, 4:19CV00356-JM-JTR. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20200320548
Visitors: 33
Filed: Mar. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Although Mr. Gilliam has listed his requests more clearly in his objections, there is still no evidence of irreparable h
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Although Mr. Gilliam has listed his requests more clearly in his objections, there is still no evidence of irreparable ha..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Although Mr. Gilliam has listed his requests more clearly in his objections, there is still no evidence of irreparable harm and his requests are so broad that an injunction would be impossible to enforce.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Richard Gilliam's motions for preliminary injunction (Doc. Nos. 10 & 11) are DENIED. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
