Hollis v. Arkansas Board of Correction, 5:19-cv-00265-JM-JJV. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20200319714
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After conducting a de novo review, this Court adopts the Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 47, 77) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against all remaining Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After conducting a de novo review, this Court adopts the Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 47, 77) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against all remaining Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2...
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After conducting a de novo review, this Court adopts the Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 47, 77) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against all remaining Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Video Evidence (Doc. No. 100) is MOOT.
3. Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse (Doc. No. 101) is DENIED.
4. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
