McAlphin v. Taylor, 4:19-CV-00863 BSM. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20200219a89
Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After de novo review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 7] is adopted. James McAlphin's claims that Scott Taylor placed him in a cell near Deverick Scott are dismissed without prejudice. McAlphin is required to pay the $400 filing fee if he wants to proceed with his claims against Keith Waddle or his claims relating to the disciplinary hearing, punishment, or retaliation. Pursuant
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After de novo review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 7] is adopted. James McAlphin's claims that Scott Taylor placed him in a cell near Deverick Scott are dismissed without prejudice. McAlphin is required to pay the $400 filing fee if he wants to proceed with his claims against Keith Waddle or his claims relating to the disciplinary hearing, punishment, or retaliation. Pursuant ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
After de novo review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 7] is adopted. James McAlphin's claims that Scott Taylor placed him in a cell near Deverick Scott are dismissed without prejudice. McAlphin is required to pay the $400 filing fee if he wants to proceed with his claims against Keith Waddle or his claims relating to the disciplinary hearing, punishment, or retaliation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
