Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jones v. Kelley, 5:19CV00364 JM/PSH. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20200317762 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2020
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253 and Ru
More

ORDER

The Court has received proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases in the United States District Court, the Court must determine whether to issue a certificate of appealability in the final order. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). The Court finds no issue on which petitioner has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer