December 21, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 93-1372
CRAIG VERNON BROBERG,
Appellee,
v.
BARRE SAVINGS BANK,
Appellee,
____________________
PENELOPE NORTHROP BROBERG,
Appellant.
__________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
___________________
Before
Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
______________
___________________
Penelope Northrop Broberg on brief pro se.
_________________________
Paul M. Cranston on Motion to Dismiss for appellee Barre
_________________
Savings Bank.
__________________
__________________
Per Curiam. Appellants have appealed from the
___________
district court's June 3, 1992 order denying a preliminary
injunction in conjunction with appellants' appeal from a
bankruptcy court dismissal of their action under 11 U.S.C.
109(g)(1). The district court denied preliminary injunctive
relief because appellants had "failed to submit any affidavit
from the Chapter 13 trustee as directed by the [district
court]" and "the data submitted being unverified by oath or
otherwise," had "failed to demonstrate a reasonable
likelihood of success on the merits." We have reviewed
appellants' brief and the portions of the district court and
bankruptcy court records submitted to us. Appellants have
not shown that the district court erred or abused its
discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief.
The June 3, 1992 order denying a preliminary
injunction is summarily affirmed. First Circuit Rule 27.1.
-2-