The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
MoreCity Sol. Waltham says that the Service's proposed addition to the existing buildings, as described in the third assessment, is twice the size of that addition described in the earlier assessments, which fact (Waltham adds) raises a number of issues which must be addressed by the Service.
12 F.3d 219, First Tennesseev.Wilson Freight**, NO. 93-8387, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit., Dec 20, 1993, 1, Appeal From: M.D.Ga.; Appealing after remand 907 F.2d 1122, 2, AFFIRMED., **, Local Rule 36 case
3 F.3d 443, First American Savingsv.Cochran***, NO. 93-8225, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit., Aug 27, 1993, 1, Appeal From: N.D.Ga., 2, AFFIRMED., *, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3, **, Local Rule 36 case
8 F.3d 21, Martinv.First Continental Life*, NO. 93-7241, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit., Oct 22, 1993, 1, Appeal From: S.D.Miss., 2, AFFIRMED., *, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2
16 F.3d 402, Barclays Bank PLCv.Red Hook Hardware, Inc., Snodgrass (James), Gregoire(Raymond), First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A., Fitzsimmons (Michael), NO. 93-7084, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit., Dec 29, 1993, Appeal From: D.V.I. Robinson, J., 1, AFFIRMED.
, United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. 10th Cir. The Bankruptcy Court dismissed Mr. Vaughan's complaint, concluding that the automatic stay had been properly modified by the February 4, 1991 order to permit the conclusion of the pending divorce action in the Texas state court.
, 2, Debtors-Appellants Weatherfords appeal the district court's Order of December 23, 1992, attached hereto, holding that the Weatherfords' appeal from the bankruptcy court's order denying their Motion to Vacate Discharge and to Dismiss Case is moot., Ltd., 706 F.2d 301 (10th Cir.1983);
4 F.3d 986, NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. Ray Cook;, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit., Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellees., PER CURIAM:, OPINION, 1, Ralph Seagle appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988).
4 F.3d 986, NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. Shirley Perrin, First Class, Defendants-Appellees., United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit., OPINION, PER CURIAM:, 1, Leon Ray Solesbee, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988).
Wayne McAllister; Washington County(Md) State Attorney, Defendants-Appellees., PER CURIAM:, OPINION, 1, Herman Joseph Jaindl filed this Notice of Appeal eight days prior to the district court's entry of judgment for the Defendants in Jaindl's civil action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988).
, 7, Even less compelling is Manufacturers' fall-back argument that, in any event, the $175, 000 reduction in Hodges' guaranty liability constituted only a de minimus benefit in light of his enormous overall debt and, as such, was insufficient to trigger the protections of Sec. 547(b).
, 4, The issue of Hodges' status as an accommodation party raises questions of both law and fact., 16, The district court held in favor of the Trustee based on the stipulated facts that debtors owed ABB the sum sought in the settled action and debtors had made the two initial payments alone.
Pat DePaulo, Defendants-Appellees., United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit., ORDER, 1, Firsttrust Money Services, Inc. (Firsttrust), a Tennessee corporation, appeals a district court order dismissing its civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. See Dixon, 928 F.2d at 218.
16 F.3d 405, In re Stoenescu (Maria); Stoenescu (Maria)v.First Trust National Association, NO. 93-5367, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit., Dec 30, 1993, Appeal From: D.N.J. Brown, J., 1, AFFIRMED.
, ORDER AND JUDGMENT1, LOGAN, Circuit Judge., 3, Decedent Myrtle C. Moncravie, plaintiff's mother and a resident of Arkansas, executed a will in Arkansas distributing her headright interest as an original Osage Indian allottee to two children of her deceased son but expressly excluding plaintiff.
Although the argument is a legitimate one and has some strength, several Courts of Appeals have already decided that the Resolution Trust and FDIC provisions allow removal of cases that have already proceeded to judgment in state court and have been taken to the state appellate system.
In its order denying defendants' motion, the district court stated that it could not determine whether a copy of the bond was actually served at the time of the seizure and, accordingly, ordered plaintiff to submit a copy of the bond to defendants., 606 F.2d 1 (2d Cir.1979);, 7, Rule 3.
10 F.3d 806, NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P., PER CURIAM:, OPINION, 1, Appellant appeals from the district court's orders that dismissed her civil complaint because it found no federal jurisdiction and denied her motion for reconsideration of that order. We find no abuse of discretion in this case
9 F.3d 114, NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.Willis GIFFORD; First Bank ofSouth Dakota;
November 17, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 93-1987 HERBERT F. MILLETTE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BRUCE WRIGHT, SUPERVISOR AT THE N.H. ___________________ __________________ __________________ Per Curiam.
