Millette v. Wright, 93-1987 (1993)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 93-1987
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 17, 1993
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: November 17, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 93-1987 HERBERT F. MILLETTE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BRUCE WRIGHT, SUPERVISOR AT THE N.H. ___________________ __________________ __________________ Per Curiam.
USCA1 Opinion
November 17, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 93-1987
HERBERT F. MILLETTE,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
BRUCE WRIGHT, SUPERVISOR AT THE N.H. STATE PRISON RECREATION
DEPARTMENT,
Defendant, Appellee.
__________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerio, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
___________________
Before
Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torrruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
______________
___________________
Herbert F. Millette on brief pro se.
___________________
__________________
__________________
Per Curiam. We agree with the magistrate's
__________
report that the "Weight Club Contract" does not create a
liberty interest, that plaintiff has no liberty interest in
using the weight room, and that consequently the state was
not required to accord plaintiff procedural protection before
barring him from the weight room. Plaintiff failed to state
a federal claim. The action was properly dismissed.
Affirmed.
________
-2-
Source: CourtListener
