Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rauh v. Daniels, 93-1634 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 93-1634 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 11, 1993
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: August 11, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 93-1634 GEORGE K. RAUH, ETC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ROBERT DANIELS, ETC., Defendant, Appellee. ______________ ____________________ George K. Rauh on brief pro se.
USCA1 Opinion









August 11, 1993

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 93-1634

GEORGE K. RAUH, ETC.,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

ROBERT DANIELS, ETC.,

Defendant, Appellee.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE


[Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Cyr, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________


George K. Rauh on brief pro se.
______________
John C. Boeckeler and Roussos, Hage & Hodes on Memorandum of Law
_________________ ______________________
in Support of Motion for Summary Dismissal of Appeal, for appellee.


____________________


____________________













Per Curiam. The judgment of dismissal is affirmed
__________

substantially for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge

and district court.

Affirmed.
________


























































Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer