Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dufield v. Warden, 93-1841 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 93-1841 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 08, 1993
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: December 8, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 93-1841 THOMAS V. DUFIELD, Petitioner, Appellant, v. WARDEN NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE PRISON, Respondent, Appellee. __________________ __________________ Per Curiam.
USCA1 Opinion









December 8, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________


No. 93-1841




THOMAS V. DUFIELD,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

WARDEN NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE PRISON,

Respondent, Appellee.


__________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE


[Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

___________________

Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
______________

___________________

Jeffrey R. Howard, Attorney General, and Mark D. Attorri,
__________________ ________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.



__________________

__________________



















Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record on appeal
___________

and affirm the judgment of the district court essentially for

the reasons stated in the order, dated July 7, 1993.

Affirmed.
_________













































-2-







Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer