Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Zagranski v. Krajnak, 94-1993 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 94-1993 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 17, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: May 17, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 94-1993 No. 94-2244 RICHARD M. ZAGRANSKI, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SUZANNE KRAJNAK, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. on brief for appellee James M. Smith.
USCA1 Opinion









May 17, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 94-1993
No. 94-2244


RICHARD M. ZAGRANSKI,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

SUZANNE KRAJNAK, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Cyr, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges. ______________


____________________


Richard M. Zagranski on brief pro se. ____________________
George W. Marion and Bulkley, Richardson and Gelinas on brief for ________________ ________________________________
appellees Suzanne Krajnak, Joseph Krajnak, Stephen Pedemonti, James M.
Smith, Public Storage Properties XVII, Ltd., Public Storage Management
and Harvey Lenkin.
Thomas E. Argenio, Associate City Solicitor, Chicopee Law ___________________
Department, on brief for appellees Edmund Dowd, Joseph Wilk and
William Hurley.
Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and Elisabeth J. Medvedow, _________________ ______________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees Judd J. Carhart, W.
Michael Ryan, Bertha Josephson, Norman Roberts and Brian Kennedy.
Brian J. Rogal and Timothy M. Burke on brief for appellee Gerard ______________ _________________
Gagne.









L. Jeffrey Meehan, Kevin M. Walkowski, and Doherty, Wallace, __________________ ____________________ __________________
Pillsbury & Murphy, P.C. on brief for appellee James M. Smith. ________________________
Alan Seewald, Assistant Town Counsel, and Ritchie, Ennis, Seewald ____________ _______________________
& Collins, P.C. on brief for appellees Timothy M. Sullivan and Stephen _______________
Zahn.


____________________

____________________






























































Per Curiam. We have reviewed carefully the record in __________

this case and the briefs of the parties. We affirm the

dismissal of appellant's complaint essentially for the

reasons given by the district court in its memorandum and

order, dated August 10, 1994.

Affirmed. ________









































-3-






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer