Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Amsden v. Senate Committee, 94-2108 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 94-2108 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 15, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: May 15, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 94-2108 HENRY H. AMSDEN, H.H. AMSDEN SONS, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.___________ Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
USCA1 Opinion









May 15, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 94-2108

HENRY H. AMSDEN, H.H. AMSDEN & SONS,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Henry H. Amsden, on brief pro se. _______________
Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and T. David Plourde, _______________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.


____________________

____________________






















Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and __________

the record on appeal. There was no error in the district

court's dismissal of the complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction nor its denial of the subsequent motion to

vacate on the additional ground of mootness.

Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1. _________ ___
















































Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer