Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nuccio v. Nuccio, 94-2184 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 94-2184 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 09, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: and Stahl, Circuit Judge.______________ ____________________ _______, Hanson DeTroy were on brief for appellee.provide a basis for the application of, equitable estoppel so as effectively to toll, the statute of limitations during the period, that the plaintiff's memories remain, repressed
USCA1 Opinion









UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 94-2184

KATHLEEN NUCCIO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LUKE NUCCIO,

Defendant - Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. David M. Cohen, U.S. Magistrate Judge] _____________________

____________________

Before

Boudin, Circuit Judge, _____________

John R. Gibson,* Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________

and Stahl, Circuit Judge. _____________

_____________________

Toby H. Hollander, with whom Law Offices of Toby H. ___________________ __________________________
Hollander was on brief for appellant. _________
David P. Very with whom Peter J. DeTroy III and Norman, ______________ ____________________ _______
Hanson & DeTroy were on brief for appellee. _______________



____________________

June 27, 1996
____________________


____________________

* Of the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.














Per Curiam. In our opinion of August 9, 1995, we __________

certified to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine pursuant to

Maine Revised Statute, 4 M.R.S.A. 57 (1989), the question of

whether the facts in this case provide a basis to apply equitable

estoppel so as to toll the statute of limitations during the

period of plaintiff's repressed memory. We retained jurisdiction

of this appeal pending determination of the issues.

We certified this question:

Does a showing that a plaintiff, who was the
victim of childhood sexual abuse, suffered
repressed memory as a result of a defendant's
threats of violence and generally violent
nature, her witnessing acts of violence by
the defendant, and her fear of the defendant,
provide a basis for the application of
equitable estoppel so as effectively to toll
the statute of limitations during the period
that the plaintiff's memories remain
repressed?

The opinion of the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine of

April 8, 1996, has answered this question in the negative,

stating that if Kathleen suffered repressed memory as a result of

the previously imposed violent conduct, as she claims, this does

not at this time equitably estop Luke from invoking the statute

of limitations.

Accordingly, we affirm the order granting summary ______

judgment in favor of Luke Nuccio on the basis that the Maine

statute of limitations barred Kathleen Nuccio's suit.






-2-






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer