April 7, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-2218
KENNETH C. HAWLEY,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
ATLANTIC CELLULAR TELEPHONE CORPORATION,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
[Hon. David M. Cohen, U.S. Magistrate Judge] _____________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Selya, Circuit Judge. _____________
____________________
William C. Nugent, with whom Wright & Nugent, P.A. was on brief _________________ ______________________
for appellant.
Jerrol A. Crouter, with whom Daniel J. Rose and Drummond Woodsum _________________ _______________ _________________
& McMahon were on brief for appellee. _________
____________________
____________________
PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant, Kenneth C. PER CURIAM. ___________
Hawley, brought suit against his former employer, defendant-
appellee, Atlantic Cellular Telephone Corp., for damages
resulting from defendant's termination of plaintiff.
Plaintiff, an account executive when discharged, brought a
seven-count complaint alleging: defamation (Count I);
intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count II);
negligent infliction of emotional distress (Count III);
breach of contract (Count IV); invasion of privacy for the
public disclosure of private facts (Count V); invasion of
privacy for placing plaintiff in a false light in the public
eye (Count VI); and punitive damages (Count VII).
At the close of discovery, defendant moved for
summary judgment on all counts save the breach of contract
claim. The district court granted summary judgment for
defendant on all the counts specified in defendant's motion.
The contract claim (Count IV) was settled. Plaintiff has
appealed only the judgments on the defamation claim (Count I)
and the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim
(Count III).
After carefully reading the record and the briefs,
we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons
stated in its order dated September 2, 1994.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. AFFIRMED ________
-2- 2