Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hawley v. Atlantic Cellular, 94-2218 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 94-2218 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 07, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: , _____________ ____________________ William C. Nugent, with whom Wright Nugent, P.A. The contract claim (Count IV) was settled. Plaintiff has appealed only the judgments on the defamation claim (Count I) and the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim (Count III).
USCA1 Opinion









April 7, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 94-2218

KENNETH C. HAWLEY,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

ATLANTIC CELLULAR TELEPHONE CORPORATION,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
[Hon. David M. Cohen, U.S. Magistrate Judge] _____________________
____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Selya, Circuit Judge. _____________

____________________

William C. Nugent, with whom Wright & Nugent, P.A. was on brief _________________ ______________________
for appellant.
Jerrol A. Crouter, with whom Daniel J. Rose and Drummond Woodsum _________________ _______________ _________________
& McMahon were on brief for appellee. _________


____________________


____________________





















PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant, Kenneth C. PER CURIAM. ___________

Hawley, brought suit against his former employer, defendant-

appellee, Atlantic Cellular Telephone Corp., for damages

resulting from defendant's termination of plaintiff.

Plaintiff, an account executive when discharged, brought a

seven-count complaint alleging: defamation (Count I);

intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count II);

negligent infliction of emotional distress (Count III);

breach of contract (Count IV); invasion of privacy for the

public disclosure of private facts (Count V); invasion of

privacy for placing plaintiff in a false light in the public

eye (Count VI); and punitive damages (Count VII).

At the close of discovery, defendant moved for

summary judgment on all counts save the breach of contract

claim. The district court granted summary judgment for

defendant on all the counts specified in defendant's motion.

The contract claim (Count IV) was settled. Plaintiff has

appealed only the judgments on the defamation claim (Count I)

and the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim

(Count III).

After carefully reading the record and the briefs,

we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons

stated in its order dated September 2, 1994.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. AFFIRMED ________





-2- 2






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer