Hallahan v. United States, 95-1290 (1995)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 95-1290
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 08, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Circuit Judges.David C. Hallahan on brief pro se.________________ _________________, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for respondent.Per Curiam.district court's opinion.conclusory to require an evidentiary hearing.
USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 95-1290
DAVID C. HALLAHAN,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
David C. Hallahan on brief pro se.
_________________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Timothy Q. Feeley,
________________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for respondent.
____________________
August 8, 1995
____________________
Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the record. We
__________
affirm for substantially the reasons stated in part B of the
district court's opinion. Petitioner's allegations were too
conclusory to require an evidentiary hearing.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.
________
-2-
Source: CourtListener
