Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Smith v. United States, 95-2237 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 95-2237 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 22, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: ___________, Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.Russell J. Smith on brief pro se., ________________, Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, and Kenneth P., ___________________ ___________, Madden, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.Per Curiam.___ S. Ct.
USCA1 Opinion









July 22, 1996
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 95-2237
No. 95-2238


RUSSELL J. SMITH,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant, Appellee.


____________________

APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Russell J. Smith on brief pro se. ________________
Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, and Kenneth P. ___________________ ___________
Madden, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee. ______


____________________


____________________



Per Curiam. On the basis of United States v. Ursery, ___________ ______________ ______














___ S. Ct. ___, 1996 WL 340815 (June 24, 1996), in which the

Supreme Court rejected a double jeopardy claim similar to the

one advanced here, the judgment is summarily affirmed. See ________ ___

Loc. R. 27.1.













































-2-






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer