The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
More101 F.3d 791, Norman E. DICKINSON, Petitioner, v.STATE OF MAINE, Respondent., PER CURIAM. As we have now determined that permission is not required because the earlier petition was dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies, petitioner may now refile his 2254 petition in the district court.
Circuit Judges.Norman E. Dickinson on motion to file second or successive, ____________________, petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 pro se.was dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.reasons stated in Camarano v. Irvin, 98 F.3d 44 (2d Cir.petition in the district court.
, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. The Chief Counsel to the Committee indicated at his deposition that the complaint concerning the failure to re-register would have been dismissed in its entirety if only Paladin had appealed the resulting letter of caution, which Paladin never did.
Barbara A. Leak; Dacey v. Dorsey, 568 F.2d 275, 278 (2d Cir.1978); Because the court properly concluded that Lagana's complaint failed to state a claim against any of the defendants under 1983, it did not abuse its discretion in sua sponte dismissing the claims against the Commissioner of HRA.
92 F.3d 1172, Arthur J. Schlegel, Nancy B. Schlegelv.First Eastern Bank, N.A. Co., Prudential Property and Casualty Company, BalboaIns. Co., Action Management, Inc., NO. 96-7177, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit., July 30, 1996, Appeal From: M.D.Pa., No. 94-cv-01617
South Carolina Department of Corrections; Leon E.Smalls, Officer, Defendants-Appellees., United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit., Donald Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se., Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Lloyd v. Felder, No. CA-95-3252-6-11AK (D.S.C.
98 F.3d 1342, NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.Max W. MENUSKIN; Alice Williams;
101 F.3d 1392, NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. 50Unnamed DEA Agent; This appeal followed.
103 F.3d 112, Asturies Investments, S.A., a Panamanian Corporationv.Clara Barton Corp., First Fidelity Bank, N.A., a NationalBanking Association, John Guyla, Sr., JeanetteGuyla, Kimball Hospitality Furniture, Inc., State of New Jersey, NO. 96-5147, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
103 F.3d 113, National Westminster Bank, N.J., First Jersey NationalBank/South, Groen, Laveson, Goldberg, Rubenstone Flager, successor to Groen, Laveson Goldbergv.Koury, Tighe, Lapres Bisulca, Theodore E. Lapres, Jr., Esq., NO. 96-5052, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
First, Wyoming County Bank Trust v. Kiley, upon which the Mosellos rely, holds only that [t]he homestead exemption delineated in [N.Y.] CPLR 5206 (subd. As the district court noted, CPLR 105(q) defines money judgment as a judgment, or any part thereof, for a sum of money. Mosello, 193 B.R.
103 F.3d 113, Midwest Portland Cement Companyv.Lawrence F. Ranallo, Trustee of Estate of Pittsburgh Food Beverage, Inc.; USCIndustries, Inc. v. Lawrence F. Ranallo, Trustee of Estateof Pittsburgh Food Beverage, Inc., NO. 96-3236, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
(Order of March 22, 1996, at 2)., 5, On appeal, 1 Garner contends that the district court erred in failing to consider the well supported facts and issues substantiating his allegations that he was retaliated against by false, malicious disciplinary reports which denied him due process of law.
, Thomas William Waldrep, Jr., BELL, DAVIS PITT, P.A., PER CURIAM:, 1, Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on Appellant's action under the Truth-In-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C.A. Coble v. Piedmont Farm Credit, No. CA-96-17-3 (M.D.N.C.
, Garri Shtein, Appellant Pro Se., PER CURIAM. We deny Appellant's motion to expedite the appeal as moot, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Jane Doe, (Aliases1-50), Defendants-Appellees., PER CURIAM:, 1, Appellant appeals from the district court's orders (1) dismissing her complaint and denying her motion for a preliminary injunction and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration. Pouncy v. Burson, No. CA-95-3611-DKC (D.Md.
Gary Johnson on brief pro se., ____________, Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, and Edwin J., __________________ ________, Gale, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief, for appellee.credited against his state sentence.state court, while the federal court acted entirely properly;
98 F.3d 1333, NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.UNITED STATES, Appellee, v.Gary JOHNSON, Defendant, Appellant. However, a state court does not have this power where, as here, the state sentence is to be served first.
Even if Murray's complaint is read to allege a broader theory of retaliation, encompassing more than just retaliation against city employees who run for office against incumbent city officials, the other fact settings he proffers do not support his claim that there is such a custom or policy.
judgment against him as to the City. Defendant also argues that Murray was not constructively, terminated and that, on the merits, he has not shown any, retaliation, much less for the expression of his political, views.the grant of summary judgment on the state law claim.such a custom or policy.
