Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Haas v. Bent & Johnson, 96-1027 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 96-1027 Visitors: 34
Filed: May 29, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: JOSEPH SANDERS HAAS, JR., ETC., ET AL.BENT JOHNSON, ET AL.Defendants, Appellees.Circuit Judges.Joseph S. Haas, Jr. on brief pro se.Per Curiam.exist and plaintiff stated no federal claim.
USCA1 Opinion









May 29, 1996
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 96-1027



JOSEPH SANDERS HAAS, JR., ETC., ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

BENT & JOHNSON, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Joseph S. Haas, Jr. on brief pro se. ___________________



____________________


____________________




Per Curiam. The action was properly dismissed for __________














lack of federal jurisdiction. Complete diversity did not

exist and plaintiff stated no federal claim.

Affirmed. ________















































-3-






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer