Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cole v. Weadock, 96-1057 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 96-1057 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: RICHARD A. COLE, M.D.Circuit Judges._______________ _____________, Special Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for, respondent.Per Curiam.the record on appeal.the district court in an order, dated November 30, 1995.
USCA1 Opinion









July 9, 1996 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 96-1057

RICHARD A. COLE, M.D.,

Petitioner,

v.

THOMAS J. WEADOCK, JR.,
Chief Probation Officer,
U.S. District of Massachusetts,

Respondent.
____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Richard A. Cole, M.D. F.A.C.P. on brief pro se. ______________________________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Jeffry Fowley, _______________ _____________
Special Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for
respondent.


____________________


____________________



















Per Curiam. We have considered the parties' briefs and __________

the record on appeal. We affirm essentially for the reasons

stated in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation,

dated November 14, 1995, which was accepted and adopted by

the district court in an order, dated November 30, 1995. In

addition, we find neither error of law nor abuse of

discretion in the district court's denial of appellant's

subsequent motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.1. _________ ___










































Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer