[NOT FOR PUBLICATION] [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
_________________________
No. 96-1202
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
THE ONE-SIXTH SHARE OF JAMES J. BULGER
IN ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE PROCEEDS OF
MASS MILLIONS LOTTERY TICKET NO. M246233,
REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF MICHAEL LINSKEY,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
JEAN HOLLAND,
Claimant, Appellant.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Stahl, Circuit Judge. _____________
____________________
Martin S. Cosgrove, with whom Cosgrove, Eisenberg & Kiley, ___________________ _____________________________
P.C. was on brief, for appellant. ____
Richard L. Hoffman, Assistant United States Attorney, with __________________
whom Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, was on brief, for _______________
the United States.
____________________
November 13, 1996
____________________
Per Curiam. On this record, the putative claimant, Per Curiam. ___________
appellant here, lacks standing to file a claim or object to the
forfeiture. Consequently, the district court did not err in
granting the government's motion to dismiss her claim. The
appellant's request for a stay pending the determination of her
appeal from the denial of her application to be appointed as
receiver for James J. Bulger, now pending in the Massachusetts
Appeals Court, is denied, as she never timely requested such a
stay in the district court. Should the appellant eventually
succeed in securing an appointment as receiver, she may move in
the district court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) for appropriate
relief from the federal judgment.
We need go no further. The judgment is
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.1. ________
2