[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________



        No. 96-1589



                                   MARIA FELINSKA,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                          NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS AND TRUCKING

                                INDUSTRY PENSION FUND,



                                 Defendant, Appellee.





                                 ____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                      [Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Cyr, Boudin and Lynch,



                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Matthew Cobb for appellant.
            ____________

            Anne  McCully Murphy with whom Charles P.  O'Connor, Morgan, Lewis
            ____________________           ____________________  _____________

        &  Bockius,  LLP,  Christopher  N.  Souris  and  Feinberg,  Charnas  &
        ________________   _______________________       _____________________

        Birmingham, P.C. are on brief for appellee. 
        ________________





                                 ____________________



                                   November 6, 1996

                                 ____________________



































                 Per Curiam.   Maria  Felinska appeals from  the district
                 __________



            court's summary judgment dismissing her claim that her former



            employer  had  discriminated  against her  by  constructively



            discharging  her because of her  age in violation  of the Age



            Discrimination in  Employment Act, 29  U.S.C.   621  et. seq.
                                                                 ________



            The district  court ruled that  Felinska had not  presented a



            prima facie  case because, even accepting  her allegations of



            fact  as  true,  they  did  not  demonstrate  a  constructive



            discharge.  Greenberg  v. Union  Camp Corp., 48  F.3d 22,  26
                        _________     _________________



            (1st Cir. 1995).  After reviewing the parties' briefs and the



            record,  we affirm substantially for the reasons given by the



            district court.



                 Affirmed.
                 ________























































                                         -2-
                                         -2-