Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cook v. Heavey, 96-1606 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 96-1606 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 24, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: MICHAEL HEAVEY, ET AL.Circuit Judges.Robert Cook on brief pro se., ___________, Joslin Ham Murphy on brief for appellees, Town defendants.Per Curiam.state a claim.plaintiff another opportunity to amend.
USCA1 Opinion












[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 96-1606

ROBERT COOK,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL HEAVEY, ET AL.,

Defendant, Appellees.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Boudin and Lynch,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Robert Cook on brief pro se. ___________
Joslin Ham Murphy on brief for appellees, Town defendants. _________________
Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and William J. Duensing, __________________ _____________________
Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Bureau, on brief for appellees,
State defendants.


____________________

December 23, 1996
____________________
















Per Curiam. Plaintiff-appellant appeals the ___________

dismissal of his second amended complaint for failure to

state a claim. Reviewing the dismissal de novo, and upon __ ____

consideration of the parties' briefs and the record, we agree

with the district court's analysis and affirm substantially

for the reasons set forth in Judge Keeton's thorough

memorandum order. There was no abuse of discretion in the

court's decision to dismiss the complaint without affording

plaintiff another opportunity to amend.

Affirmed. ________

































-2-






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer