USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 97-1185
JOANN CARON,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER,
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Frank H. Freedman, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Francis Lafayette on brief for appellant.
_________________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, Karen L. Goodwin,
_________________ __________________
Assistant United States Attorney, and Sara Gardiner Kilkenny,
_________________________
Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, on brief
for appellee.
____________________
September 3, 1997
____________________
Per Curiam. We have examined the parties' briefs
__________
and the record on appeal. Although we have considerable
doubt whether the district court had jurisdiction, the
Commissioner's decision is adequately supported, so we see no
need to reach the jurisdictional issue in this case. We
affirm the order of the district court, dated November 27,
1996, essentially for the reasons given in the district court
Memorandum of the same date. We would add only the
following.
Claimant argues the Administrative Law Judge
("ALJ") improperly used "the Grid" (20 C.F.R. Part 404,
Subpart P, App. 2) in evaluating claimant's nonexertional
limitations. This court has noted use of "the Grid" alone
may be improper in some cases involving nonexertional
limitations. Ortiz v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
______________________________________________
890 F.2d 520, 524-24 (1st Cir. 1989). But here the ALJ
followed the rule from Ortiz by using the testimony of a
_____
vocational expert in addition to using "the Grid." Id. Thus,
___
the ALJ's use of "the Grid" was not improper.
Claimant also argues the ALJ failed to evaluate her
subjective complaints of pain. While a more detailed
analysis of those complaints would have been preferable, see
___
Frustaglia v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 829 F.2d
__________________________________________________
192, 195 (1st Cir. 1987), we have examined the record and we
-2-
conclude the ALJ had ample support for his conclusion that
the claimant's subjective complaints were not credible.
AFFIRMED.
_________
-3-
