Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Singer v. Davis, 99-1092 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 99-1092 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 21, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Circuit Judges., Sandra M. Singer on brief pro se., Stewart A. Engel on brief for appellees. Upon review of the briefs and record, we, conclude that the district court properly dismissed plaintiff's, complaint. See District of, Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476 (1983);
USCA1 Opinion


       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit





Nos. 99-1092
99-1376
99-1581

SANDRA SINGER,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

GEORGE DAVIS, JOINT VENTURE,
PRIMO REALTY TRUST, DAVIS LIQUIDATIONS
TRUST, DIANA DAVIS,

Defendants, Appellees.



APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]




Before

Selya, Boudin and Lynch,
Circuit Judges.





Sandra M. Singer on brief pro se.
Stewart A. Engel on brief for appellees.





September 16, 1999



Per Curiam. Upon review of the briefs and record, we
conclude that the district court properly dismissed plaintiff's
complaint. The issues raised, even were they not vague and
unsupported, were inextricably intertwined with review of the
state court proceedings. Accordingly, the district court
lacked jurisdiction to consider those claims. See District of
Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476 (1983);
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415-16 (1923);
Lancellotti v. Fay, 909 F.2d 15, 17 (1st Cir. 1990).
Plaintiff's vague and unsupported allegations of denial of due
process did not require any other result, and we find no merit
in plaintiff's specific appellate arguments to the contrary.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer