Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mendonca v. Medeiros, 99-1879 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 99-1879 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 23, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Defendants, Appellees.and Lipez, Circuit Judge., Crisanto Mendonca on brief pro se., Per Curiam. , See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S., 462, 476 (1983) ([A] United States District Court has no, authority to review final judgments of a state court in, judicial proceedings.
USCA1 Opinion


       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit





No. 99-1879

CRISANTO MENDONCA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH MEDEIROS, JAMES KILDUFF, INC.,

Defendants, Appellees.



APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge]



Before

Selya, Circuit Judge,
Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lipez, Circuit Judge.





Crisanto Mendonca on brief pro se.
Michelle A. Matusewicz and Law Offices of Lawrence F.
McAuliffe on brief for appellees.





December 23, 1999






Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record
and the submissions of the parties, we affirm on the ground
that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S.
462, 476 (1983) ("[A] United States District Court has no
authority to review final judgments of a state court in
judicial proceedings."); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S.
413, 415-16 (1923) (same).
Affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer