Filed: Oct. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Defendants, Appellees.Stahl and Howard, Circuit Judges.Joseph M. Baldacci on brief for appellant., Thomas A. Knowlton on brief for appellees.October 23, 2013, PER CURIAM.appeal and considered the appellant's arguments.court was plainly correct to dismiss the complaint.
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 13-1415
DAVID MILLS,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
LYNNE CALERO, DOUGLAS MILLETT, MARY C. MAYHEW,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before
Lynch, Chief Judge,
Stahl and Howard, Circuit Judges.
Joseph M. Baldacci on brief for appellant.
Thomas A. Knowlton on brief for appellees.
October 23, 2013
PER CURIAM. We have carefully reviewed the briefs on
appeal and considered the appellant's arguments. The district
court was plainly correct to dismiss the complaint. Mills's
arguments are based on a misapprehension of the Rooker-Feldman
doctrine, see D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462
(1983), and of issue preclusion, and are without merit. For the
reasons set forth in the district court's order, Mills v. Calero,
No. 1:11-cv-00470 (D. Me. Mar. 7, 2013), we summarily affirm. See
1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).
-2-
