Filed: Apr. 24, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 760 F.2d 244 Frieda Joyce JOHNSON, personal representative of the Estate of Horton Winfield Johnson, for herself and for the benefit of Kevin Lee Nix, Cynthia Anne Johnson and Tamara Joyce Nix, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 83-5764. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 24, 1985. Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., Joel D. Eaton, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants. Jeffrey D. Fisher, Spec. Asst. U.S.
Summary: 760 F.2d 244 Frieda Joyce JOHNSON, personal representative of the Estate of Horton Winfield Johnson, for herself and for the benefit of Kevin Lee Nix, Cynthia Anne Johnson and Tamara Joyce Nix, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 83-5764. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 24, 1985. Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., Joel D. Eaton, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants. Jeffrey D. Fisher, Spec. Asst. U.S. ..
More
760 F.2d 244
Frieda Joyce JOHNSON, personal representative of the Estate
of Horton Winfield Johnson, for herself and for the benefit
of Kevin Lee Nix, Cynthia Anne Johnson and Tamara Joyce Nix,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 83-5764.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
April 24, 1985.
Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., Joel D. Eaton, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Jeffrey D. Fisher, Spec. Asst. U.S. Atty., Linda Collins-Hertz, Jonathan Goodman, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., Robert S. Greenspan, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Nicholas Stephen Zeppos, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Jose A. Gonzalez, Judge.
ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION
(Opinion January 10, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 749 F.2d 1530)
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
1
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
2
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The order denying rehearing and rehearing en banc entered on March 26, 1985, 758 F.2d 660, and the prior panel's opinion are hereby VACATED.
