Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

84-3625 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 84-3625 Visitors: 26
Filed: May 27, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 791 F.2d 833 John C. RAINEY, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Barbara A. Rainey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEECH AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Beech Aerospace Services, Inc., and Pratt and Whitney Aircraft of Canada, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. Rondi M. KNOWLTON, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donald Bruce Knowlton, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEECH AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Beech Aerospace Services, Inc., and Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Of Canada, Ltd., De
More

791 F.2d 833

John C. RAINEY, Individually and as Personal Representative
of the Estate of Barbara A. Rainey, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BEECH AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Beech Aerospace Services, Inc.,
and Pratt and Whitney Aircraft of Canada, Ltd.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Rondi M. KNOWLTON, Individually and as Personal
Representative of the Estate of Donald Bruce
Knowlton, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BEECH AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Beech Aerospace Services, Inc.,
and Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Of Canada, Ltd.,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 84-3625, 84-3626.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

May 27, 1986.

Dennis K. Larry, Donald H. Partington, Pensacola, Fla., Edward R. Curtis, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Joseph W. Womack, R. Benjamin Reid, Miami, Fla., Robert P. Gaines, Joe J. Harrell, Pensacola, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; Winston E. Arnow, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 25, 1986, 11th Cir., 1986, 784 F.2d 1523)

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of this Court in active serving having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the above-consolidated causes shall be reheard by this Court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer