Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roy Allen Harich v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 86-3167 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 86-3167 Visitors: 30
Filed: Sep. 10, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 828 F.2d 1497 Roy Allen HARICH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard L. DUGGER, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 86-3167. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept. 10, 1987. Jonathan F. Horn, CBS, Inc., New York City, David A. Reiser, Office of Capital Collateral Representative, Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioner-appellant. Margene A. Roper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, Fla., for respondent-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court
More

828 F.2d 1497

Roy Allen HARICH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Richard L. DUGGER, Secretary, Florida Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-3167.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 10, 1987.

Jonathan F. Horn, CBS, Inc., New York City, David A. Reiser, Office of Capital Collateral Representative, Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioner-appellant.

Margene A. Roper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; George Kendall Sharp, Judge.

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

1

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

2

(Opinion March 18, 1987, 11th Cir., 1987, 813 F.2d 1082)

BY THE COURT:

3

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing in banc,

4

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of October 19, 1987, on or hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer