Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Samuel Goldstein, 24920 (1958)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 24920 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 28, 1958
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 256 F.2d 581 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel GOLDSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 324, Docket 24920. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued April 17, 1958. Decided April 28, 1958. Arthur D. Goldstein (of Samuel Goldstein & Sons), New York City, for defendant-appellant. Nicholas Tsoucalas, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., and John A. Guzzetta, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee. Befor
More

256 F.2d 581

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Samuel GOLDSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 324, Docket 24920.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 17, 1958.
Decided April 28, 1958.

Arthur D. Goldstein (of Samuel Goldstein & Sons), New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Nicholas Tsoucalas, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., and John A. Guzzetta, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Ryan, United States v. Pay-O-Matic Corp., 162 F. Supp. 154; and see also United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co., 355 U.S. 587, 78 S. Ct. 442, 2 L. Ed. 2d 510.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer