Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Pellegrino Millo, 29743_1 (1968)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 29743_1 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 25, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 392 F.2d 591 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pellegrino MILLO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 513, Docket 29743. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. April 25, 1968. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 After we affirmed the conviction of Millo, 354 F.2d 224 (2 Cir. 1965), appellant petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review that affirmance. The writ having been granted, th
More

392 F.2d 591

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Pellegrino MILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 513, Docket 29743.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

April 25, 1968.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

After we affirmed the conviction of Millo, 354 F.2d 224 (2 Cir. 1965), appellant petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review that affirmance. The writ having been granted, the judgment of conviction in the district court and the judgment of this court affirming the conviction were vacated and the action was remanded to us, sub nom Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202, 88 S. Ct. 899, 19 L. Ed. 2d 1034 (1968), for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S. Ct. 697, 19 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968).

2

After taking further consideration we now on the authority of Marchetti remand the case to the district court and direct that the indictment be dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer