Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Allison T. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson, 15755_1 (1966)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 15755_1 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 01, 1966
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 361 F.2d 335 Allison T. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Raymond W. ANDERSON. No. 15755. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued May 20, 1966. Decided June 1, 1966. David Snellenburg, II, Wilmington, Del., for appellant. Charles L. Paruszewski, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Wilmington, Del., for appellee. Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and SMITH, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. 1 The judgment of conviction of appellant in the Delaware Superior Court on its own particu
More

361 F.2d 335

Allison T. WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
Raymond W. ANDERSON.

No. 15755.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 20, 1966.
Decided June 1, 1966.

David Snellenburg, II, Wilmington, Del., for appellant.

Charles L. Paruszewski, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Wilmington, Del., for appellee.

Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment of conviction of appellant in the Delaware Superior Court on its own particular facts is not in conflict with Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S. Ct. 1774, 12 L. Ed. 2d 908 (1964) or with Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S. Ct. 1758, 12 L. Ed. 2d 977 (1964), whether or not finally held retrospective in its application or with United States ex rel. Russo v. State of New Jersey, 351 F.2d 429 (3 Cir. 1965). In all other aspects the state trial was free from substantial error.

2

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer