Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-2025 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 95-2025 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 07, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 98 F.3d 730 BEVERLY ENTERPRISES-PENNSYLVANIA, INC., d/b/a Stenton Hall Nursing and Convalescent Home, Appellant, v. DISTRICT 1199C NATIONAL UNION OF HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES, AFSCME, AFL-CIO; National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, AFSCME, AFL-CIO. No. 95-2025. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Oct. 7, 1996. Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER
More

98 F.3d 730

BEVERLY ENTERPRISES-PENNSYLVANIA, INC., d/b/a Stenton Hall
Nursing and Convalescent Home, Appellant,
v.
DISTRICT 1199C NATIONAL UNION OF HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE
EMPLOYEES, AFSCME, AFL-CIO; National Union of
Hospital and Health Care Employees,
AFSCME, AFL-CIO.

No. 95-2025.

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Oct. 7, 1996.

Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.*

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

Prior report: 90 F.3d 93.

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

1

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, and to all the other available circuit judges in active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

*

As to panel rehearing only

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer