Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Frank H. Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company, 9210 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 9210 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 24, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 327 F.2d 637 Frank H. GOFORTH, Appellee, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 9210. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued Jan. 21, 1964. Decided Jan. 24, 1964. Harry DuMont, Asheville, N.C. (Uzzell & DuMont, Asheville, N.C., on brief), for appellant. Harold K. Bennett, Asheville, N.C., for appellee. Before HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges, and MICHIE, District Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 We agree with the District Court that a private automobile being driven from the plac
More

327 F.2d 637

Frank H. GOFORTH, Appellee,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 9210.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Jan. 21, 1964.
Decided Jan. 24, 1964.

Harry DuMont, Asheville, N.C. (Uzzell & DuMont, Asheville, N.C., on brief), for appellant.

Harold K. Bennett, Asheville, N.C., for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges, and MICHIE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

We agree with the District Court that a private automobile being driven from the place of business of the owner by a garage keeper to his garage for the purpose of effecting repairs requested by the owner was not being 'used in the automobile business' within the meaning of an exclusion clause in the owner's liability insurance policy.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer