Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

A/s Glittre v. Amos Fontenot and A. Joubert, 20494 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 20494 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 03, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 327 F.2d 637 A/S GLITTRE, Appellant, v. Amos FONTENOT and A. Joubert, Appellees. No. 20494. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Rehearing Denied March 3, 1964. John H. Land, Frank M. Adams, Beaumont, Tex., for appellant. O. J. Weber, Jr., Keith, Mehaffy & Weber, Bill J. Sanders, Beaumont, Tex. (Dewey J. Gonsoulin, Beaumont, Tex., of counsel), for appellees. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This appeal from an interlocutory decree holdin
More

327 F.2d 637

A/S GLITTRE, Appellant,
v.
Amos FONTENOT and A. Joubert, Appellees.

No. 20494.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1964.

John H. Land, Frank M. Adams, Beaumont, Tex., for appellant.

O. J. Weber, Jr., Keith, Mehaffy & Weber, Bill J. Sanders, Beaumont, Tex. (Dewey J. Gonsoulin, Beaumont, Tex., of counsel), for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal from an interlocutory decree holding respondent, Glittre, solely responsible for the damages sustained by the trawler Sea Queen and personal injuries to its captain and coowner, Fontenot, presents only factual issues. The trial court's findings are supported by substantial evidence and may not be reversed by this Court on appeal. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S. Ct. 6, 99 L. Ed. 20.

2

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer