Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kenneth M. Flynn v. Raymond W. Kalb, Edgar S. Kalb and Esther Kalb Hancock, Co-Partners, D/B/A 'Kal-Han-Co.,' T/a 'Beverley Beach Club,', 9683_1 (1965)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 9683_1 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 08, 1965
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 341 F.2d 582 Kenneth M. FLYNN, Appellee, v. Raymond W. KALB, Edgar S. Kalb and Esther Kalb Hancock, co-partners, D/B/A 'Kal-Han-Co.,' T/A 'Beverley Beach Club,' Appellants. No. 9683. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued Feb. 4, 1965. Decided Feb. 8, 1965. Herbert F. Murray, Baltimore, Md. (Clater W. Smith and Smith, Somerville & Case, Baltimore, Md., on brief) for appellants. Carleton U. Edwards, II, Washington, D.C. (Bernard Margolius, Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellee.
More

341 F.2d 582

Kenneth M. FLYNN, Appellee,
v.
Raymond W. KALB, Edgar S. Kalb and Esther Kalb Hancock,
co-partners, D/B/A 'Kal-Han-Co.,' T/A 'Beverley
Beach Club,' Appellants.

No. 9683.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 4, 1965.
Decided Feb. 8, 1965.

Herbert F. Murray, Baltimore, Md. (Clater W. Smith and Smith, Somerville & Case, Baltimore, Md., on brief) for appellants.

Carleton U. Edwards, II, Washington, D.C. (Bernard Margolius, Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The testimony warranting a finding of insufficiency of the supervision at this public swimming beach leaves a troublesome question of its proximate relation to the injury of the swimmer. The Court, recognizing its closeness, is of the opinion that different inferences might be drawn by reasonable men, and that the question was properly submitted to the jury.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer