Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd. v. M/v American Legend, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and United States Lines, Inc., 85-1183 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 85-1183 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 06, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 804 F.2d 837 1987 A.M.C. 282 CINCINNATI MILACRON, LTD., Appellant, v. M/V AMERICAN LEGEND, her engines, boilers, etc., and United States Lines, Inc., Appellees. No. 85-1183. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued Oct. 7, 1986. Decided Nov. 6, 1986. James D. Skeen (David W. Skeen, Constable, Alexander, Daneker & Skeen, on brief), for appellant. John H. West, III (Roann Nichols, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, on brief), for appellees. Before WINTER, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS
More

804 F.2d 837

1987 A.M.C. 282

CINCINNATI MILACRON, LTD., Appellant,
v.
M/V AMERICAN LEGEND, her engines, boilers, etc., and United
States Lines, Inc., Appellees.

No. 85-1183.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 7, 1986.
Decided Nov. 6, 1986.

James D. Skeen (David W. Skeen, Constable, Alexander, Daneker & Skeen, on brief), for appellant.

John H. West, III (Roann Nichols, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, on brief), for appellees.

Before WINTER, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc.

PER CURIAM:

1

On rehearing of this appeal en banc, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for reasons stated in the dissent to the superseded panel decision. See Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd. v. M/V American Legend, 784 F.2d 1161, 1166 (4th Cir.1986) (dissenting opinion).

2

Chief Judge Winter and Judge Ervin dissent and would reverse for reasons stated in the superseded opinion for the panel majority. See id. at 1162.

3

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer