Filed: Jan. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2779 D. JOHNSON WILLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and EARNESTINE BROWN; JAMES EDWARD RHODES; AMY COX; JAMES MEADOWS; LENA BROWN; NELSON DOVE; ROSETTA MEADOWS; THERESA MURRELL; JAMES G. GRADY; ALBERT H. BROWN; ELLEN CROUELL; FRANKLIN BROWN, Plaintiffs, versus TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF JONES, NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA DEPART- MENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES, Defendants - Appellees, and ENV
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2779 D. JOHNSON WILLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and EARNESTINE BROWN; JAMES EDWARD RHODES; AMY COX; JAMES MEADOWS; LENA BROWN; NELSON DOVE; ROSETTA MEADOWS; THERESA MURRELL; JAMES G. GRADY; ALBERT H. BROWN; ELLEN CROUELL; FRANKLIN BROWN, Plaintiffs, versus TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF JONES, NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA DEPART- MENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES, Defendants - Appellees, and ENVI..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2779
D. JOHNSON WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
EARNESTINE BROWN; JAMES EDWARD RHODES; AMY
COX; JAMES MEADOWS; LENA BROWN; NELSON DOVE;
ROSETTA MEADOWS; THERESA MURRELL; JAMES G.
GRADY; ALBERT H. BROWN; ELLEN CROUELL;
FRANKLIN BROWN,
Plaintiffs,
versus
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF
JONES, NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA DEPART-
MENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL
RESOURCES,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Defendant.
No. 95-2822
D. JOHNSON WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JAMES EDWARD RHODES; VELMA MCMILLIAN; MAMIE
RHODES; HELEN BURNEY; BARBARA BURNEY; SUZETTE
BRANCH; LAURA MORGAN; ORESLEY WILLIAMS;
EARNESTINE BROWN; IRISH BURNEY,
Plaintiffs,
versus
JONES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JAMES E. STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED;
NEUSE RIVER COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS; NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, and its
Entity, Division of Community Assistance; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, and
its Entity, Office of Fair Housing; HAROLD
KOONCE; C. DAVID HARRIS AND ASSOCIATES,
Defendants.
2
No. 95-2955
D. JOHNSON WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JAMES EDWARD RHODES; VELMA MCMILLIAN; MAMIE
RHODES; HELEN BURNEY; BARBARA BURNEY; SUZETTE
BRANCH; LAURA MORGAN; ORESLEY WILLIAMS;
EARNESTINE BROWN; IRISH BURNEY,
Plaintiffs,
versus
JONES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JAMES E. STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED;
NEUSE RIVER COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS; NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, and its
Entity, Division of Community Assistance; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, and
its Entity, Office of Fair Housing; HAROLD
KOONCE; C. DAVID HARRIS AND ASSOCIATES,
Defendants.
3
No. 95-2995
D. JOHNSON WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
HARDY BROCK; BARBARA BURNEY; LENA BROWN; EDNA
BROWN; JAMES EDWARD RHODES; FANNIE MCDANIEL;
EARNESTINE BROWN; BLANCHIE DOVE; BLANCHE DOVE,
Plaintiffs,
versus
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF
JONES, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ANN BROCK; EDWARD EUBANKS; CHARLES JONES, Mem-
bers of the Town Council of Trenton; C. GLENN
SPIVEY, Clerk to the Town Council; NOLAN B.
JONES, Chairman of the Jones County Commis-
sioners; HORACE B. PHILLIPS; ROBERT WILLIAM
MATTOCKS; CHARLES BATTLE, JR.; LESLIE DEWEY
STRAYHORN, Members of the Jones County Com-
missioners; LARRY P. MEADOWS, Jones County
Manager, JOFFREE T. LEGGETT, Mayor of Trenton,
Defendants.
4
No. 95-2996
DANIEL J. WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 95-2997
D. JOHNSON WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
HARDY BROCK; ANITA B. BROWN; EARNESTINE BROWN;
LENA BROWN; DEBRA CURETON,
Plaintiffs,
versus
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
5
No. 95-2998
DANIEL J. WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOFFREE T. LEGGETT, Mayor of the Town of
Trenton; EDWARD EUBANKS, Member of the Town
Council of Trenton; ANN BROCK, Member of the
Town Council of Trenton; CHARLES JONES, Member
of the Town Council of Trenton; CHARLES R.
HUGHES, Chairman of Election of Jones County,
Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-93-79-4-H, CA-93-23-4-H, CA-92-92-4-H, CA-92-
107-4-H, CA-92-148-4-H, CA-92-159-4-H)
No. 95-2935
DANIEL J. WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
6
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOFFREE T. LEGGETT, Mayor of the Town of
Trenton; EDWARD EUBANKS, Member of the Town
Council of Trenton; ANN BROCK, Member of the
Town Council of Trenton; CHARLES JONES, Member
of the Town Council of Trenton; CHARLES R.
HUGHES, Chairman of Election of Jones County,
Defendants.
No. 95-2940
D. JOHNSON WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
HARDY BROCK; BARBARA BURNEY; LENA BROWN; EDNA
BROWN; JAMES EDWARD RHODES; FANNIE MCDANIEL;
EARNESTINE BROWN,
Plaintiffs,
versus
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF
JONES, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees,
7
and
ANN BROCK; EDWARD EUBANKS; CHARLES JONES, Mem-
bers of the Town Council of Trenton; C. GLENN
SPIVEY, Clerk to the Town Council; NOLAN B.
JONES, Chairman of the Jones County Commis-
sioners; HORACE B. PHILLIPS; ROBERT WILLIAM
MATTOCKS; CHARLES BATTLE, JR.; LESLIE DEWEY
STRAYHORN, Members of the Jones County Com-
missioners; LARRY P. MEADOWS, Jones County
Manager,
Defendants.
No. 95-2941
DANIEL J. WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 95-2942
D. JOHNSON WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
8
9
HARDY BROCK; ANITA B. BROWN; EARNESTINE BROWN;
LENA BROWN; DEBRA CURETON,
Plaintiffs,
versus
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-92-92-4-H, CA-92-107-4-H, CA-92-148-4-H, CA-92-159-4-H)
Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
D. Johnson Willis, a/k/a Daniel J. Willis, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Scott Pierce, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-
Salem, North Carolina; Daniel Calvin Oakley, Assistant Attorney
General, Charles Jerome Murray, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Cheryl A. Marteney, WARD
& SMITH, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
10
PER CURIAM:
Appellant noted the appeals in Nos. 95-2779, 95-2822, 95-2935,
95-2940, 95-2941, and 95-2942 outside the appeal period established
by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain extensions of the
appeal periods within the additional thirty-day period provided by
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P.
4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of
Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.
Robinson,
361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its
orders on October 14, 1993, January 12 and 13, 1994, and March 22
and 30, 1995. Appellant's notices of appeal were filed on Septem-
ber 25 and 26, 1995, October 16 and 30, 1995, and November 7, 1995.
Appellant's failure to note timely appeals or obtain extensions of
the appeal periods deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider
these cases. We therefore dismiss these appeals.
Appellant timely appealed the district court orders entered on
October 16, 1995, and November 3, 1995, in Nos. 95-2955, 95-2995,
95-2996, 95-2997, and 95-2998. The subjects of these appeals are
the district court's orders striking Appellant's untimely notices
of appeal. The district court did not have jurisdiction to strike
the untimely notices of appeal. See Liles v. South Carolina Dep't
of Corrections, 414 F.2d 612, 614 (4th Cir. 1969). However, we
dismiss these appeals as moot because the untimely appeals were
11
transmitted to this court, so the Appellant received the relief he
sought.
We deny the Appellant's motions for oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
12
