Filed: Apr. 14, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1230 ANGELA D. CLEMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOME SAVERS, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and WHITE AND SELKIN, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (2:07-cv-00244-TEM) Submitted: April 4, 2008 Decided: April 14, 2008 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angela D. Cl
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1230 ANGELA D. CLEMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOME SAVERS, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and WHITE AND SELKIN, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (2:07-cv-00244-TEM) Submitted: April 4, 2008 Decided: April 14, 2008 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angela D. Cle..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1230
ANGELA D. CLEMONS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HOME SAVERS, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
WHITE AND SELKIN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate
Judge. (2:07-cv-00244-TEM)
Submitted: April 4, 2008 Decided: April 14, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angela D. Clemons, Appellant Pro Se. Darlene Paige Bradberry,
Randolph Courtland DuVall, BREEDEN, SALB, BEASLEY & DUVALL, PLC,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Angela D. Clemons appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting summary judgment to Home Savers, LLC, and dismissing her
complaint alleging several torts and violations of state and
federal law with respect to the sale of her home.* We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See
Clemons v. Home Savers, LLC,
530 F. Supp. 2d 803 (E.D. Va. 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 3 -