Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7882 ALLEN WAYNE POSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT CONRAD, JR., Judge; VENTO, Assistant US Attorney; ODULIO, Assistant US Attorney; ERIC DAVIS, Special Agent (FBI); STITITE, Special Agent (FBI); JOHN CACHERIS, Attorney; JOE BILL PUTNAM; HARRY PUTNAM; DENNIS DEVINE; PHOEBE DEVINE; DOUGLAS WAYNE COBB; G. K. DAVIS; DAVID MUSICK; TRAVIS KISER; JACK LEDBETTER; DOE 1, Spouse of Douglas Wayne Cobb, Defendants - Appellees. A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7882 ALLEN WAYNE POSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT CONRAD, JR., Judge; VENTO, Assistant US Attorney; ODULIO, Assistant US Attorney; ERIC DAVIS, Special Agent (FBI); STITITE, Special Agent (FBI); JOHN CACHERIS, Attorney; JOE BILL PUTNAM; HARRY PUTNAM; DENNIS DEVINE; PHOEBE DEVINE; DOUGLAS WAYNE COBB; G. K. DAVIS; DAVID MUSICK; TRAVIS KISER; JACK LEDBETTER; DOE 1, Spouse of Douglas Wayne Cobb, Defendants - Appellees. Ap..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7882
ALLEN WAYNE POSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT CONRAD, JR., Judge; VENTO, Assistant US Attorney;
ODULIO, Assistant US Attorney; ERIC DAVIS, Special Agent
(FBI); STITITE, Special Agent (FBI); JOHN CACHERIS,
Attorney; JOE BILL PUTNAM; HARRY PUTNAM; DENNIS DEVINE;
PHOEBE DEVINE; DOUGLAS WAYNE COBB; G. K. DAVIS; DAVID
MUSICK; TRAVIS KISER; JACK LEDBETTER; DOE 1, Spouse of
Douglas Wayne Cobb,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:13-cv-00586-FDW)
Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen Wayne Poston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Allen Wayne Poston appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six unknown
Names Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971),
as barred by Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477 (1994). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court but
modify the dismissal to be without prejudice to Poston’s right
to refile if his conviction is invalidated or called into
question by the appropriate court. Poston v. Conrad, No. 3:13-
cv-00586-FDW (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2