Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

James E. Ector v. S. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison, 21-40001 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 21-40001 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 12, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 438 F.2d 975 James E. ECTOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Lamont SMITH, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Respondent-Appellee. No. 30733 Summary Calendar. * United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 12, 1971. James E. Ector, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles B. Merrill, Jr., Courtney Wilder Stanton, Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee. Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 This is
More

438 F.2d 975

James E. ECTOR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
S. Lamont SMITH, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 30733 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 12, 1971.

James E. Ector, pro se.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles B. Merrill, Jr., Courtney Wilder Stanton, Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This is an appeal from the denial of a Georgia state prisoner's petition for the writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

2

Upon a plea of guilty to robbery, Ector was sentenced to life imprisonment. His sole contention is that negroes were systematically excluded from the grand jury that indicted him.

3

After a hearing the Superior Court of Tattnall County, Georgia, denied relief. Without appeal to the Supreme Court of Georgia, Ector filed his petition in the District Court. The writ was denied because the court properly found that Ector had failed to exhaust available state remedies. Fay v. Noia, 1963, 372 U.S. 391, 82 S. Ct. 822, 9 L. Ed. 2d 827; Williams v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1970, 427 F.2d 921; Donlavey v. Smith, 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 800; Williams v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1969, 410 F.2d 144; Goodwin v. Holman, 5 Cir. 1966, 361 F.2d 403.

4

Affirmed.

Notes:

*

[1] Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer