Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Herman Ackerman, 81-1571 (1983)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 81-1571 Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 21, 1983
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 719 F.2d 1282 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman ACKERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 81-1571. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nov. 21, 1983. Linda Broocks (Court-appointed), Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant. Ronald C.H. Eddins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Eldon B. Mahon, Judge. ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion May 2, 1983, 5 Cir.198
More

719 F.2d 1282

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Herman ACKERMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 81-1571.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1983.

Linda Broocks (Court-appointed), Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Ronald C.H. Eddins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Eldon B. Mahon, Judge.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion May 2, 1983, 5 Cir.1983, 704 F.2d 1344).

Before BROWN, GOLDBERG and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. See United States v. Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324, n. 20 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc) (1981).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer